阿泰专属英语练习_在线真题试卷与模拟练习_阿泰专属英语练习

Choosing between money and passion is a dilemma that troubles the minds of many people all over the world. The stakes are pretty high as only a handful of people are fortunate enough to find a job that pays well and fulfills them. Should you try and settle for a promising career without much passion, or should you risk it for a job that you love and fulfills you? Well, there is no simple "yes" or "no" answer to this question. Many critical factors need to be considered before deciding between a job for money or passion. Earning potential Before diving into a field of interest, you should consider the earning potential it offers. There is a chance that your passion has great pay.Yet, the time when you should consider putting your passion aside for a while – not forgetting it – is when you know you won't be able to afford it. Pleasure in the work environment It's no secret that a career you're passionate about will, in most cases, provide you with a more pleasurable work environment. Chances are that your coworkers will be like-minded, and besides the working part, you'll have fun during the hours spent interacting with them. Fulfillment It goes without saying that you feel fulfilled when you work on something meaningful to you. And especially after achieving the end goal of it. Obstacles you find on your way won't be as relevant because you will always find a creative way around them. Choosing between a beloved field and the one that will pay your bills can sometimes send you into a spiral of thoughts that are hard to get out of. When making the decision, you should look into the advantages and disadvantages that come with either one of the possibilities. From money to happiness and fulfillment, these all play a role in this puzzle. But, most importantly, remember to listen to the logic and your heart simultaneously because they generally come up with the best （ verdict ） together. What does the passage imply （暗示）about finding a job that pays well and fulfills you?

Choosing between money and passion is a dilemma that troubles the minds of many people all over the world. The stakes are pretty high as only a handful of people are fortunate enough to find a job that pays well and fulfills them. Should you try and settle for a promising career without much passion, or should you risk it for a job that you love and fulfills you? Well, there is no simple "yes" or "no" answer to this question. Many critical factors need to be considered before deciding between a job for money or passion. Earning potential Before diving into a field of interest, you should consider the earning potential it offers. There is a chance that your passion has great pay.Yet, the time when you should consider putting your passion aside for a while – not forgetting it – is when you know you won't be able to afford it. Pleasure in the work environment It's no secret that a career you're passionate about will, in most cases, provide you with a more pleasurable work environment. Chances are that your coworkers will be like-minded, and besides the working part, you'll have fun during the hours spent interacting with them. Fulfillment It goes without saying that you feel fulfilled when you work on something meaningful to you. And especially after achieving the end goal of it. Obstacles you find on your way won't be as relevant because you will always find a creative way around them. Choosing between a beloved field and the one that will pay your bills can sometimes send you into a spiral of thoughts that are hard to get out of. When making the decision, you should look into the advantages and disadvantages that come with either one of the possibilities. From money to happiness and fulfillment, these all play a role in this puzzle. But, most importantly, remember to listen to the logic and your heart simultaneously because they generally come up with the best （ verdict ） together. According to the passage, people should put their passion aside when ________.

Choosing between money and passion is a dilemma that troubles the minds of many people all over the world. The stakes are pretty high as only a handful of people are fortunate enough to find a job that pays well and fulfills them. Should you try and settle for a promising career without much passion, or should you risk it for a job that you love and fulfills you? Well, there is no simple "yes" or "no" answer to this question. Many critical factors need to be considered before deciding between a job for money or passion.

Earning potential

Before diving into a field of interest, you should consider the earning potential it offers. There is a chance that your passion has great pay.Yet, the time when you should consider putting your passion aside for a while – not forgetting it – is when you know you won't be able to afford it.

Pleasure in the work environment

It's no secret that a career you're passionate about will, in most cases, provide you with a more pleasurable work environment. Chances are that your coworkers will be like-minded, and besides the working part, you'll have fun during the hours spent interacting with them.

Fulfillment

It goes without saying that you feel fulfilled when you work on something meaningful to you. And especially after achieving the end goal of it. Obstacles you find on your way won't be as relevant because you will always find a creative way around them.

Choosing between a beloved field and the one that will pay your bills can sometimes send you into a spiral of thoughts that are hard to get out of. When making the decision, you should look into the advantages and disadvantages that come with either one of the possibilities. From money to happiness and fulfillment, these all play a role in this puzzle. But, most importantly, remember to listen to the logic and your heart simultaneously because they generally come up with the best （ verdict ） together.

People should take the following factors into consideration when choosing a job except for 除了________.

Choosing between money and passion is a dilemma that troubles the minds of many people all over the world. The stakes are pretty high as only a handful of people are fortunate enough to find a job that pays well and fulfills them. Should you try and settle for a promising career without much passion, or should you risk it for a job that you love and fulfills you? Well, there is no simple "yes" or "no" answer to this question. Many critical factors need to be considered before deciding between a job for money or passion. Earning potential Before diving into a field of interest, you should consider the earning potential it offers. There is a chance that your passion has great pay.Yet, the time when you should consider putting your passion aside for a while – not forgetting it – is when you know you won't be able to afford it. Pleasure in the work environment It's no secret that a career you're passionate about will, in most cases, provide you with a more pleasurable work environment. Chances are that your coworkers will be like-minded, and besides the working part, you'll have fun during the hours spent interacting with them. Fulfillment It goes without saying that you feel fulfilled when you work on something meaningful to you. And especially after achieving the end goal of it. Obstacles you find on your way won't be as relevant because you will always find a creative way around them. Choosing between a beloved field and the one that will pay your bills can sometimes send you into a spiral of thoughts that are hard to get out of. When making the decision, you should look into the advantages and disadvantages that come with either one of the possibilities. From money to happiness and fulfillment, these all play a role in this puzzle. But, most importantly, remember to listen to the logic and your heart simultaneously because they generally come up with the best （ verdict ） together. What does "verdict" refer to in the last paragraph?

Choosing between money and passion is a dilemma that troubles the minds of many people all over the world. The stakes are pretty high as only a handful of people are fortunate enough to find a job that pays well and fulfills them. Should you try and settle for a promising career without much passion, or should you risk it for a job that you love and fulfills you? Well, there is no simple "yes" or "no" answer to this question. Many critical factors need to be considered before deciding between a job for money or passion. Earning potential Before diving into a field of interest, you should consider the earning potential it offers. There is a chance that your passion has great pay.Yet, the time when you should consider putting your passion aside for a while – not forgetting it – is when you know you won't be able to afford it. Pleasure in the work environment It's no secret that a career you're passionate about will, in most cases, provide you with a more pleasurable work environment. Chances are that your coworkers will be like-minded, and besides the working part, you'll have fun during the hours spent interacting with them. Fulfillment It goes without saying that you feel fulfilled when you work on something meaningful to you. And especially after achieving the end goal of it. Obstacles you find on your way won't be as relevant because you will always find a creative way around them. Choosing between a beloved field and the one that will pay your bills can sometimes send you into a spiral of thoughts that are hard to get out of. When making the decision, you should look into the advantages and disadvantages that come with either one of the possibilities. From money to happiness and fulfillment, these all play a role in this puzzle. But, most importantly, remember to listen to the logic and your heart simultaneously because they generally come up with the best （ verdict ） together. Which of the following would be the best title of the passage?

We seem to be living in an age of anxiety today. For many people, anxiety is often associated with negative life events and makes them suffocate. Anxiety disorders have also emerged as prevalent mental health problems. However, I hold the view that anxiety, as an emotion, can work as a tool to help us manage the challenges in our lives. Emotions such as anger, fear, and anxiety are more beneficial than harmful. They function as tools for survival, forged and refined over hundreds of thousands of years of human evolution to safeguard and promote our flourishing. They do this by offering two key elements: information and preparation. Anxiety is information about uncertainties in the future: something bad could happen, but something good could still happen, too. Anxiety occurs before a difficult conversation with your boss that might go well or the other way. Anxiety is different from fear, which is information about certain and present threats, like seeing a shark fin rise out of the water mere yards away from where you're swimming. Anxiety prepares us to persist, remain vigilant, and act in ways that avoid future disasters, and it can also make positive possibilities become reality Under the influence of anxiety over the unpredictable, we tend to be not only more creative and innovative but also more focused and efficient. Being anxious also triggers our motivation for reward and social engagement, impelling us to work for what we care about, develop relationships, and be more productive. Therefore, from the perspective of evolutionary theory, anxiety isn't detrimental but embodies the logic of survival. Distinct from an infectious disease or cancer, avoiding and suppressing anxiety is prone to amplify it, simultaneously preventing us from finding productive solutions to manage it and to foster emotional resilience skills. This is the vicious cycle of anxiety: feeling anxiety as dangerous, fearing it, and ultimately escaping from it through suppression and avoidance, hence spiraling it beyond control. Learning to be anxious in the appropriate manner means finding ways to navigate through it rather than around it, to leverage and channel anxiety to achieve objectives, and to discern when anxiety isn't beneficial and practice letting it go. According to the text, how does the writer view anxiety?

We seem to be living in an age of anxiety today. For many people, anxiety is often associated with negative life events and makes them suffocate. Anxiety disorders have also emerged as prevalent mental health problems. However, I hold the view that anxiety, as an emotion, can work as a tool to help us manage the challenges in our lives. Emotions such as anger, fear, and anxiety are more beneficial than harmful. They function as tools for survival, forged and refined over hundreds of thousands of years of human evolution to safeguard and promote our flourishing. They do this by offering two key elements: information and preparation. Anxiety is information about uncertainties in the future: something bad could happen, but something good could still happen, too. Anxiety occurs before a difficult conversation with your boss that might go well or the other way. Anxiety is different from fear, which is information about certain and present threats, like seeing a shark fin rise out of the water mere yards away from where you're swimming. Anxiety prepares us to persist, remain vigilant, and act in ways that avoid future disasters, and it can also make positive possibilities become reality Under the influence of anxiety over the unpredictable, we tend to be not only more creative and innovative but also more focused and efficient. Being anxious also triggers our motivation for reward and social engagement, impelling us to work for what we care about, develop relationships, and be more productive. Therefore, from the perspective of evolutionary theory, anxiety isn't detrimental but embodies the logic of survival. Distinct from an infectious disease or cancer, avoiding and suppressing anxiety is prone to amplify it, simultaneously preventing us from finding productive solutions to manage it and to foster emotional resilience skills. This is the vicious cycle of anxiety: feeling anxiety as dangerous, fearing it, and ultimately escaping from it through suppression and avoidance, hence spiraling it beyond control. Learning to be anxious in the appropriate manner means finding ways to navigate through it rather than around it, to leverage and channel anxiety to achieve objectives, and to discern when anxiety isn't beneficial and practice letting it go. According to the text, why does anxiety serve as a useful emotion?

We seem to be living in an age of anxiety today. For many people, anxiety is often associated with negative life events and makes them suffocate. Anxiety disorders have also emerged as prevalent mental health problems. However, I hold the view that anxiety, as an emotion, can work as a tool to help us manage the challenges in our lives. Emotions such as anger, fear, and anxiety are more beneficial than harmful. They function as tools for survival, forged and refined over hundreds of thousands of years of human evolution to safeguard and promote our flourishing. They do this by offering two key elements: information and preparation. Anxiety is information about uncertainties in the future: something bad could happen, but something good could still happen, too. Anxiety occurs before a difficult conversation with your boss that might go well or the other way. Anxiety is different from fear, which is information about certain and present threats, like seeing a shark fin rise out of the water mere yards away from where you're swimming. Anxiety prepares us to persist, remain vigilant, and act in ways that avoid future disasters, and it can also make positive possibilities become reality Under the influence of anxiety over the unpredictable, we tend to be not only more creative and innovative but also more focused and efficient. Being anxious also triggers our motivation for reward and social engagement, impelling us to work for what we care about, develop relationships, and be more productive. Therefore, from the perspective of evolutionary theory, anxiety isn't detrimental but embodies the logic of survival. Distinct from an infectious disease or cancer, avoiding and suppressing anxiety is prone to amplify it, simultaneously preventing us from finding productive solutions to manage it and to foster emotional resilience skills. This is the vicious cycle of anxiety: feeling anxiety as dangerous, fearing it, and ultimately escaping from it through suppression and avoidance, hence spiraling it beyond control. Learning to be anxious in the appropriate manner means finding ways to navigate through it rather than around it, to leverage and channel anxiety to achieve objectives, and to discern when anxiety isn't beneficial and practice letting it go. How does anxiety differ from fear?

We seem to be living in an age of anxiety today. For many people, anxiety is often associated with negative life events and makes them suffocate. Anxiety disorders have also emerged as prevalent mental health problems. However, I hold the view that anxiety, as an emotion, can work as a tool to help us manage the challenges in our lives. Emotions such as anger, fear, and anxiety are more beneficial than harmful. They function as tools for survival, forged and refined over hundreds of thousands of years of human evolution to safeguard and promote our flourishing. They do this by offering two key elements: information and preparation. Anxiety is information about uncertainties in the future: something bad could happen, but something good could still happen, too. Anxiety occurs before a difficult conversation with your boss that might go well or the other way. Anxiety is different from fear, which is information about certain and present threats, like seeing a shark fin rise out of the water mere yards away from where you're swimming. Anxiety prepares us to persist, remain vigilant, and act in ways that avoid future disasters, and it can also make positive possibilities become reality Under the influence of anxiety over the unpredictable, we tend to be not only more creative and innovative but also more focused and efficient. Being anxious also triggers our motivation for reward and social engagement, impelling us to work for what we care about, develop relationships, and be more productive. Therefore, from the perspective of evolutionary theory, anxiety isn't detrimental but embodies the logic of survival. Distinct from an infectious disease or cancer, avoiding and suppressing anxiety is prone to amplify it, simultaneously preventing us from finding productive solutions to manage it and to foster emotional resilience skills. This is the vicious cycle of anxiety: feeling anxiety as dangerous, fearing it, and ultimately escaping from it through suppression and avoidance, hence spiraling it beyond control. Learning to be anxious in the appropriate manner means finding ways to navigate through it rather than around it, to leverage and channel anxiety to achieve objectives, and to discern when anxiety isn't beneficial and practice letting it go. What is the "vicious cycle of anxiety" mentioned in the text?

We seem to be living in an age of anxiety today. For many people, anxiety is often associated with negative life events and makes them suffocate. Anxiety disorders have also emerged as prevalent mental health problems. However, I hold the view that anxiety, as an emotion, can work as a tool to help us manage the challenges in our lives. Emotions such as anger, fear, and anxiety are more beneficial than harmful. They function as tools for survival, forged and refined over hundreds of thousands of years of human evolution to safeguard and promote our flourishing. They do this by offering two key elements: information and preparation. Anxiety is information about uncertainties in the future: something bad could happen, but something good could still happen, too. Anxiety occurs before a difficult conversation with your boss that might go well or the other way. Anxiety is different from fear, which is information about certain and present threats, like seeing a shark fin rise out of the water mere yards away from where you're swimming. Anxiety prepares us to persist, remain vigilant, and act in ways that avoid future disasters, and it can also make positive possibilities become reality Under the influence of anxiety over the unpredictable, we tend to be not only more creative and innovative but also more focused and efficient. Being anxious also triggers our motivation for reward and social engagement, impelling us to work for what we care about, develop relationships, and be more productive. Therefore, from the perspective of evolutionary theory, anxiety isn't detrimental but embodies the logic of survival. Distinct from an infectious disease or cancer, avoiding and suppressing anxiety is prone to amplify it, simultaneously preventing us from finding productive solutions to manage it and to foster emotional resilience skills. This is the vicious cycle of anxiety: feeling anxiety as dangerous, fearing it, and ultimately escaping from it through suppression and avoidance, hence spiraling it beyond control. Learning to be anxious in the appropriate manner means finding ways to navigate through it rather than around it, to leverage and channel anxiety to achieve objectives, and to discern when anxiety isn't beneficial and practice letting it go. How does the text suggest we should approach anxiety?

One early study of heroism suggests heroes and non-heroes may have essential differences. A paper published in the Journal of Research in Personality found heroism to be dependent on individual disposition. Psychologists compared 25 Canadians who received awards for life-risking bravery with a control group and found that the heroes possessed an expanded worldview, greater positivity, and a higher sense of efficacy (效能感). Philip Zimbardo, a psychologist who has conducted research on examining the psychology of heroism defines heroism as taking a personal risk for the common good while others remain passive. The risks might be substantial: losing money, social status, or credibility, or endangering oneself or one's family members. He suggests there's power in picturing oneself as a "hero in waiting," an idea he calls "heroic imagination." Is it possible for ordinary people to be inspired and trained to be everyday heroes? Zimbardo has discussed the potential value of mentally preparing children to intervene in challenging situations – to stand up to a bully, help a stranger or speak up on behalf of another. There is more evidence. A 2018 study surveyed 62 fourth- and fifth-grade students in Michigan. The study showed that children's courage levels increased after a training program, suggesting that the trait of heroism can be cultivated. More people and organizations have developed heroism training programs and workshops to help bring the insights of social psychology on heroism to a wider audience. Some workshops cater to high school and college students, as well as to workplaces. Workshops include a segment on developing a growth mindset – the belief that one's skills and qualities are not inherent but instead can be cultivated through effort and perseverance. Other segments help students deal with the pressure to conform to group norms, learn to identify and counteract bias and discrimination, and develop the ability needed to combat the bystander effect – the impulse to stand by in emergencies when others are present who might intervene. What are the essential qualities of heroes according to the study in Paragraph 1?

One early study of heroism suggests heroes and non-heroes may have essential differences. A paper published in the Journal of Research in Personality found heroism to be dependent on individual disposition. Psychologists compared 25 Canadians who received awards for life-risking bravery with a control group and found that the heroes possessed an expanded worldview, greater positivity, and a higher sense of efficacy (效能感). Philip Zimbardo, a psychologist who has conducted research on examining the psychology of heroism defines heroism as taking a personal risk for the common good while others remain passive. The risks might be substantial: losing money, social status, or credibility, or endangering oneself or one's family members. He suggests there's power in picturing oneself as a "hero in waiting," an idea he calls "heroic imagination." Is it possible for ordinary people to be inspired and trained to be everyday heroes? Zimbardo has discussed the potential value of mentally preparing children to intervene in challenging situations – to stand up to a bully, help a stranger or speak up on behalf of another. There is more evidence. A 2018 study surveyed 62 fourth- and fifth-grade students in Michigan. The study showed that children's courage levels increased after a training program, suggesting that the trait of heroism can be cultivated. More people and organizations have developed heroism training programs and workshops to help bring the insights of social psychology on heroism to a wider audience. Some workshops cater to high school and college students, as well as to workplaces. Workshops include a segment on developing a growth mindset – the belief that one's skills and qualities are not inherent but instead can be cultivated through effort and perseverance. Other segments help students deal with the pressure to conform to group norms, learn to identify and counteract bias and discrimination, and develop the ability needed to combat the bystander effect – the impulse to stand by in emergencies when others are present who might intervene. Which of the following is true according to Philip Zimbardo?

One early study of heroism suggests heroes and non-heroes may have essential differences. A paper published in the Journal of Research in Personality found heroism to be dependent on individual disposition. Psychologists compared 25 Canadians who received awards for life-risking bravery with a control group and found that the heroes possessed an expanded worldview, greater positivity, and a higher sense of efficacy (效能感). Philip Zimbardo, a psychologist who has conducted research on examining the psychology of heroism defines heroism as taking a personal risk for the common good while others remain passive. The risks might be substantial: losing money, social status, or credibility, or endangering oneself or one's family members. He suggests there's power in picturing oneself as a "hero in waiting," an idea he calls "heroic imagination." Is it possible for ordinary people to be inspired and trained to be everyday heroes? Zimbardo has discussed the potential value of mentally preparing children to intervene in challenging situations – to stand up to a bully, help a stranger or speak up on behalf of another. There is more evidence. A 2018 study surveyed 62 fourth- and fifth-grade students in Michigan. The study showed that children's courage levels increased after a training program, suggesting that the trait of heroism can be cultivated. More people and organizations have developed heroism training programs and workshops to help bring the insights of social psychology on heroism to a wider audience. Some workshops cater to high school and college students, as well as to workplaces. Workshops include a segment on developing a growth mindset – the belief that one's skills and qualities are not inherent but instead can be cultivated through effort and perseverance. Other segments help students deal with the pressure to conform to group norms, learn to identify and counteract bias and discrimination, and develop the ability needed to combat the bystander effect – the impulse to stand by in emergencies when others are present who might intervene. What does the 2018 research suggest?

One early study of heroism suggests heroes and non-heroes may have essential differences. A paper published in the Journal of Research in Personality found heroism to be dependent on individual disposition. Psychologists compared 25 Canadians who received awards for life-risking bravery with a control group and found that the heroes possessed an expanded worldview, greater positivity, and a higher sense of efficacy (效能感). Philip Zimbardo, a psychologist who has conducted research on examining the psychology of heroism defines heroism as taking a personal risk for the common good while others remain passive. The risks might be substantial: losing money, social status, or credibility, or endangering oneself or one's family members. He suggests there's power in picturing oneself as a "hero in waiting," an idea he calls "heroic imagination." Is it possible for ordinary people to be inspired and trained to be everyday heroes? Zimbardo has discussed the potential value of mentally preparing children to intervene in challenging situations – to stand up to a bully, help a stranger or speak up on behalf of another. There is more evidence. A 2018 study surveyed 62 fourth- and fifth-grade students in Michigan. The study showed that children's courage levels increased after a training program, suggesting that the trait of heroism can be cultivated. More people and organizations have developed heroism training programs and workshops to help bring the insights of social psychology on heroism to a wider audience. Some workshops cater to high school and college students, as well as to workplaces. Workshops include a segment on developing a growth mindset – the belief that one's skills and qualities are not inherent but instead can be cultivated through effort and perseverance. Other segments help students deal with the pressure to conform to group norms, learn to identify and counteract bias and discrimination, and develop the ability needed to combat the bystander effect – the impulse to stand by in emergencies when others are present who might intervene. Why do people hold heroism training programs?