chapter3_在线真题试卷与模拟练习_chapter3_考试宝

更新时间：试题数量：购买人数：提供作者：

有效期：个月

章节介绍：共有个章节

收藏

我的练习

我的错题
(0道)

我的收藏
(0道)

我的斩题
(0道)

我的笔记
(0道)

专项练习

顺序练习 0 / 0

随机练习 自定义设置练习量

题型乱序 按导入顺序练习

模拟考试 仿真模拟

题型练习 按题型分类练习

易错题 精选高频易错题

学习资料 考试学习相关信息

搜索

题库预览

Providing specific and precise details about materials and methods

Giving reasons why a particular method was adopted

Pointing out any precautions/ appropriate care taken

Discussing any limitations in the method or problems the writer encountered

Referring to the literature to justify a method or approach

Changes in the chemistry of groundwater in the chalk of the London Basin Methodology 1 The current investigation involved sampling and analysing six sites to measure changes in groundwater chemistry. 2 The sites were selected from the London Basin area, which is located in the south-east of England and has been frequently used to interpret groundwater evolution.[2, 3, 4] 3 A total of 18 samples was collected and then analysed for the isotopes mentioned earlier. 4 Samples 1-9 were collected in thoroughly-rinsed 25 ml brown glass bottles which were filled to the top and then sealed tightly to prevent contamination. 5 The filled bottles were shipped directly to two separate laboratories at Reading University, where they were analysed using standard methods suitably miniaturised to handle small quantities of water. [5] 6 Samples 10-18 were prepared in our laboratory using a revised version of the precipitation method established by the ISF Institute in Germany. [6] 7 This method obtains a precipitate through the addition of BaCl2.2H2O; the resulting precipitate can be washed and stored easily. 8 The samples were subsequently shipped to ISF for analysis by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). 9 All tubing used was stainless steel, and although two samples were at risk of CFC contamination as a result of brief contact with plastic, variation among samples was negligible.

the writer provides details about what was done and used and shows that care was taken.【仅支持A-H选项，选项超出支持范围】

Data was initially collected for this study via a focus group interview in April 2002 that lasted approximately 1h with a convenience sample of two female and five male lifeguards (paid employees of Surf Life Saving Queensland) and lifesavers (unpaid volunteers) that worked for SLSQ. The members of the focus group sample were highly experienced lifeguards/savers, with between 11 and 26 years (16 years on average) experience. During the interview the behaviour of international and domestic visitors to beaches on the Southeast Queensland coast was examined from the perspective of surf rescuers. The decision to focus on SLSA (Surf Life Saving Australia) lifeguards/savers is related to the fact that they are a feature of virtually all popular Australian beaches and their contribution to beach safety is widely recognised (Bigby, McClure, & Green, 2000). The rest of the data that was needed to successfully complete this study was collected using a questionnaire survey distributed in the lecture environment to a convenience sample of students at the University of Queensland, during November 2002. In total, 176 students were surveyed, 70% were Australian and 30% were international students. Using a multi-method approach supported by Pizam and Sussmann (1995), the comments of the lifeguards/savers during the focus group interview were used in the construction of the questionnaire. The need to collect data from international students in Australia, the majority of who come from Asia (Bohm, Davis, Meares, & Pearce, 2002), was a reason behind the decision to use a questionnaire. This method avoided the need for students to express themselves in interview or focus group contexts, which tend to be stressful and threatening for Asian students in particular. This cultural issue has the joint effect of dissuading Asian students from taking part in interviews and focus groups, and inhibiting the freedom of expression of those who do take part in these types of data collection methods (Lin, Endler, & Kocovski, 2001). During analysis of the focus group and survey data the emphasis was on understanding "the world of lived experiences from the point of view of those who live it" (Locke, 2001, p. 8). Therefore, all the data was analysed using an interpretative approach that attempted to provide a holistic analysis of the variety of the students’ knowledge of beach safety and behaviour when at the beach and the views of the lifeguards/savers rather than attempt to reduce them to a "norm" (Kitchin & Tate, 2000; Glesne, 1999). Statistical analysis of the survey data was undertaken using a series of chi square tests to add to the understanding of the information provided by the students. The significance level used for all the chi square tests was 0.05.【缺少答案，请补充】

What is the primary source of data collection mentioned in the study’s initial phase?

The decision to focus on SLSA lifeguards/savers was based on which of the following reasons?

The multi-method approach used in this study involved which of the following steps?

Why was a questionnaire survey chosen as a data collection method for the university students?

How was the data from the focus group and survey analyzed in this study?

What is the main purpose of the "Materials and Methods" section in a research article?

Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of the scientific method mentioned in the passage?

Why is it important to provide exact technical specifications and sources of materials in the Methods section?

If human subjects were used in a research study, what is an essential component to include in the Methods section?

Which of the following statements best reflects the principle discussed in the passage about the presentation of methods in scientific writing?

How do the characteristics of the Methods section in research papers differ between social sciences and hard sciences, biological, and medical research?

Most research is best understood as being either quantitative or qualitative in nature. In general, quantitative research specifies numerical assignment to the phenomena under

resources and time often prohibit such an exhaustive endeavor. Therefore, it is best to match the particular research goal to the research strategy that will help achieve that goal. If a researcher desires a more narrative understanding, then a qualitative strategy would be preferred. The main advantage of qualitative research is that it provides a richer and more in-depth understanding of the population under study. Techniques such as interviews and focus groups allow the research participants to give very detailed and specific answers. For example, imagine that you are hired by a hospital to explore people’s experience with holistic (also called alternative or complementary) medicine. In such a project, conducting a focus group with patients who suffer from chronic pain and asking them to respond to several questions would provide a rich description of these people’s experiences. Questions might include what symptoms they have (for example, migraine headaches), what alternative treatment modalities they have tried, and what effects those treatments have had on their symptoms. The results of these【缺少答案，请补充】

What is the main difference between quantitative and qualitative research?

What is the main difference between quantitative and qualitative research?

What is the primary advantage of quantitative research?

1 2