首页  /     /   在线练习

更新时间：   试题数量：   购买人数：   提供作者：

有效期： 个月

章节介绍： 共有个章节

收藏
搜索
题库预览
A firstborn child was examined as an infant by a doctor who was a specialist in the diagnosis of speech and hearing impairments. Although the doctor should have concluded that the infant was totally deaf due to a hereditary condition, the doctor negligently concluded that the infant's hearing was normal. After the diagnosis, but before they learned that the infant was in fact deaf, the parents conceived a second child who also suffered total deafness due to the hereditary condition. The parents claim that they would not have conceived the second child had they known of the high probability of the hereditary condition. They have sought the advice of their attorney regarding which negligence action against the doctor is most likely to succeed. 一名专门诊断语言和听力障碍的医生在婴儿时期对一名长子进行了检查。尽管医生本应得出判断，婴儿由于遗传性疾病而完全失聪，但他疏忽大意地认为婴儿的听力是正常的。在诊断后，但在他们得知婴儿实际上是聋哑人之前，父母怀上了第二个孩子，这个孩子也因遗传性疾病而完全失聪。父母声称，如果他们知道遗传性疾病的高概率，就不会怀上第二个孩子。他们已经就哪种针对医生的过失诉讼最有可能成功征求了律师的意见。【缺少答案，请补充】
What sort of action against the doctor should the attorney recommend? 律师应该建议对医生采取什么样的行动?
A driver sued her insurance company on an accident insurance policy covering personal injuries to the driver. The insurance company defended on the ground that the driver's injuries were intentionally self-inflicted and therefore excluded from the policy's coverage. The driver testified at trial that she had inflicted the injuries, as her negligence had caused the crash in which she was injured, but that she had not done so intentionally. She then called as a witness her treating psychiatrist to give his opinion that the driver had been mentally unbalanced, but not self-destructive, at the time of the crash. 一名司机起诉了她的保险公司，因为事故保险单涵盖了司机的个人伤害。保险公司辩称，司机的伤害是故意自我造成的，因此不包括在保险单的覆盖范围内。司机在庭审中作证说，她确实造成了这些伤害，因为她的疏忽导致了使她受伤的事故，但她并非有意为之。随后，她传唤了她的精神科医生作为证人，让他提供意见，称司机在事故发生时精神状态不稳定，但没有自我毁灭。【缺少答案，请补充】
Should the court admit the witness's opinion? 法庭是否应该接受证人的意见?
A man tied his dog to a bike rack in front of a store and left the dog there while he went inside to shop. The dog was usually friendly and placid. A five-year-old child started to tease the dog by pulling gently on its ears and tail. When the man emerged from the store and saw what the child was doing to the dog, he became extremely upset. 一个男人把他的狗拴在一家商店前的自行车架上，然后把狗留在那里，自己进去购物。这只狗通常很友好平和。一个五岁的孩子开始轻轻地拉扯狗的耳朵和尾巴来逗弄它。当这个男人从商店里出来，看到孩子对狗做的事情时，他变得非常沮丧。【缺少答案，请补充】
Does the man have a viable claim against the child for trespass to chattels? 那个男人是否对这个孩子提出了侵犯动产的切实指控?
After a jury trial, the defendant was found liable for fraud. On appeal, the defendant argues that the verdict was not supported by sufficient evidence, as the plaintiff failed to prove intent beyond a reasonable doubt. 陪审团审判后，被告被判犯有欺诈罪。在上诉时，被告辩称判决没有足够的证据支持，因为原告未能证明其意图超出合理怀疑范围。
Under which standard of review will the appellate court evaluate the sufficiency of the evidence? 根据何种审查标准，上诉法院将评估证据的充分性?
A builder borrowed $$10,000 from a lender to finance a small construction job under a contract with a homeowner. The builder gave the lender a writing that stated, "Any money I receive from the homeowner will be paid immediately to the lender, regardless of any demands from other creditors." The builder died after completing the job but before the homeowner paid. The lender demanded that the homeowner pay the $$10,000 due to the builder directly to the lender. The homeowner refused, saying that he would pay directly to the builder's estate everything that he owed the builder. 一位建筑商向出借人借了一万美元，用于资助一项小型建筑工程，这项工程是根据与房主的合同进行的。建筑商给出借人写了一张条子，上面写着：“我从房主那里收到的任何钱，都将立即偿还给出借人，不管其他出借人提出什么要求。”建筑商在完成工程后去世，但在房主付款之前就去世了。出借人要求房主直接向出借人支付建筑商欠建筑商的一万美元。房主拒绝了，说他会直接向建筑商的遗产偿还他欠建筑商的所有债务。【缺少答案，请补充】
After a jury trial,the defendant was found liable for fraud.On appeal,the defendant argues that the verdict was not supported by sufficient evidence,as the plaintiff failed to prove intent beyond a reasonable doubt. 陪审团审判后，被告被判犯有欺诈罪。在上诉时，被告辩称判决没有足够的证据支持，因为原告未能证明其意图超出合理怀疑范围。 Under which standard of review will the appellate court evaluate the sufficiency of the evidence? 根据何种审查标准，上诉法院将评估证据的充分性？
A builder borrowed $$10,000 from a lender to finance a small construction job under a contract with a homeowner.The builder gave the lender a writing that stated,"Any money I receive from the homeowner will be paid immediately to the lender,regardless of any demands from other creditors."The builder died after completing the job but before the homeowner paid.The lender demanded that the homeowner pay the $$10,000 due to the builder directly to the lender.The homeowner refused,saying that he would pay directly to the builder's estate everything that he owed the builder. 一位建筑商向出借人借了一万美元，用于资助一项小型建筑工程，这项工程是根据与房主的合同进行的。建筑商给出借人写了一张条子，上面写着“我从房主那里收到的任何钱，都将立即偿还给出借人，不管其他出借人提出什么要求。”建筑商在完成工程后去世，但在房主付款之前就去世了。出借人要求房主直接向出借人支付建筑商欠建筑商的一万美元。房主拒绝了，说他会直接向建筑商的遗产偿还他欠建筑商的所有债务。 Is the lender likely to succeed in an action against the homeowner for $10,000? 贷款人有可能成功对房主提起10,000美元的诉讼吗？
A company owned a large tract of land that contained coal deposits that the company intended to mine.The company acquired mining equipment and began to plan its mining operations.Just as the company was about to begin mining,Congress enacted a statute that imposed a number of new environmental regulations and land-reclamation requirements on all mining operations within the United States.The statute made the company's planned mining operations economically infeasible.As a result,the company sold the tract of land to a farmer.While the sale price allowed the company to recover its original investment in the land,it did not cover the additional cost of the mining equipment the company had purchased or the profits it had expected to earn from its mining operations on the land.In an action filed against the appropriate federal official,the company claims that the statute effected a taking of its property for which it is entitled to just compensation in an amount equal to the cost of the mining equipment it purchased and the profits it expected to earn from its mining operations on the land. 一家公司拥有一大片土地，其中包含该公司打算开采的煤炭储量。该公司购买了采矿设备，并开始规划其采矿作业。就在该公司即将开始采矿时，国会通过了一项法案，对美国境内的所有采矿作业强制实施了一系列新的环境法规和土地征用要求。该法案使该公司计划的采矿作业在经济上变得不可行。结果，该公司将这片土地出售给了位农民。尽管出售价格使该公司收回了对land.in的原始投资，但它并未覆盖该公司购买的采矿设备的额外成本，也未覆盖该公司预期从land.in采矿作业中获得的利润。在对相关联邦官员提起的诉讼中，该公司声称该法案实际上剥夺了其财产，因此它有权获得相当于其购买的采矿设备成本和预期从land.in采矿作业中赚取的利润的补偿。 Which of the following is the most appropriate result in the action? 以下哪个是诉讼中最合适的结果？
In the wake of massive terrorist attacks carried out inside the United States by foreign citizens,Congress declared war on the terrorists'nation of origin.It also passed a statute requiring every alien who is a citizen of the enemy nation to either immediately leave the United States voluntarily or be subject to deportation.An inseverable provision of the new statute provides that the United States Supreme Court will have original and exclusive jurisdiction over any action brought to challenge the validity of the statute. 在外国公民在美国境内实施大规模恐怖袭击后，国会向恐怖分子的origin.it国宣战。国会还通过了一项法令，要求所有作为敌国公民的外星人立即自愿离开美国，否则将被驱逐出境。新法令的一项不可改变的条款规定，美国最高法院将对任何挑战该法律有效性的行动拥有最初和独家的管辖权。 Is the new statute constitutional? 新法律是否符合宪法？
A man owned alarge tract of land that had frontage on a public highway.The land had no access to any other road.Fifteen years ago,the man conveyed the rear half of the land to a woman and at the same time conveyed an express easement to the woman that provided access from her land across his retained land to the public highway.The woman used the easement until she reconveyed the land back tothe man 10 years ago.The deed to the man made no reference to the easement.Five years ago,the man again conveyed the rear half of the land,this time to an investor in a deed that made no reference to any easement to the public highway.Recently,the man told the investor that he could no longer cross the man's land for access to the public highway.A neighbor has told the investor that he can use her land for access to another public road "for a price."The investor has sued the man for the right to cross the man's land to the public highway. 一个男人拥有一大片土地，其正面位于一条公共高速公路上。这片土地无法通往任何其他道路。十五年前，这个男人将土地的后半部分转让给了一个女人，同时还向这个女人提供了一份快速地契，提供了从她的土地穿过他保留的土地到达公共高速公路的通道。这个女人使用了这份地契，直到十年前她将土地重新转让给了这个男人。给这个男人的契约中没有提及任何地契。五年前，这个男人再次转让了土地的后半部分，这次是给了一个投资者，这份契约中没有提及任何通往公共高速公路的地契。最近，这个男人告诉投资者，他不能再穿过这个男人的土地到达公共高速公路。一个邻居告诉投资者，他可以使用她的土地到达另一条公共高速公路，“只要出价”。投资者已经起诉了这个男人，要求获得穿过这个男人土地到达公共高速公路的权利。 For whom will the court likely decide? 法院可能会为谁做出裁决？
A defendant is on trial for knowing possession of a stolen television. The defendant claims that the television was a gift from a friend, who has disappeared. The defendant seeks to testify that he was present when the friend told her neighbor that the television had been given to the friend by her mother. 一名被告因知道自己拥有一台偷来的电视机而正在接受审判。被告声称这台电视机是一位朋友送的礼物，但这位朋友已经失踪了。被告试图证明，当这位朋友告诉邻居这台电视机是她母亲送给朋友的时候，他就在场。 Is the defendant's testimony about the friend's statement to the neighbor admissible? 被告关于朋友向邻居陈述的证词是否可以接受？
Upon the recommendation of her child's pediatrician, a mother purchased a vaporizer for her child, who had been suffering from respiratory congestion. The vaporizer consisted of a gallon-size glass jar, which held water to be heated until it became steam, and a metal heating unit into which the jar fit. The jar was covered by a plastic cap with an opening to allow the steam to escape. At the time the vaporizer was manufactured and sold, there was no safer alternative design. The booklet that accompanied the vaporizer read, "This product is safe, spillproof, and practically foolproof. It shuts off automatically when the water is gone." The booklet had a picture of a vaporizer sending steam over a baby's crib. The mother used the vaporizer whenever the child was suffering from congestion. She placed the vaporizer on the floor near the child's bed. One night, the child got out of bed to get a drink of water and tripped over the cord of the vaporizer as she crossed the room. The top of the vaporizer separated from the base, and boiling water from the jar silled on the child when the vaporizer tipped over. The child suffered serious burns as a consequence. The child's representative brought an action for damages against the manufacturer of the vaporizer. The manufacturer moved to dismiss after the representative presented the evidence above. 根据孩子儿科医生的推荐，一位母亲为她患有呼吸道充血的孩子购买了一台蒸汽机。这台蒸汽机由一个加仑大小的玻璃罐组成，罐中装有待加热直至变成蒸汽的水，以及一个金属加热单元，罐子可以放入其中。罐子上盖着一个塑料盖，盖子上有一个开口，以便蒸汽可以逃逸。在蒸汽机制造和销售时，没有比它更安全的替代设计。随蒸汽机一起出售的小册子上写着：“这个产品安全、防溢出，实际上也是防foolproof.it 的。当水用完时，它会自动关闭。”小册子上有一幅蒸汽机向婴儿床喷射蒸汽的图片。每当孩子患有充血性疾病时，这位母亲就会使用蒸汽机。她把蒸汽机放在孩子bed.one 附近的地板上。一天晚上，孩子从bed.one 下床喝水，在穿过房间时被蒸汽机的电线绊倒了。蒸汽机的顶部与底部分离，当蒸汽机翻倒时，罐中的沸水溅到了孩子身上。结果，孩子严重烧伤。孩子的代表对蒸汽机制造商提起了损害赔偿诉讼。在代表提供了上述证据后，制造商撤销了诉讼。【缺少答案，请补充】
Should the manufacturer's motion be granted? 制造商的动议应该被批准吗？
A prosecutor presented to a federal grand jury the testimony of a witness in order to secure a defendant's indictment for theft of government property. The prosecutor did not disclose to the grand jury that the witness had been convicted four years earlier of perjury. The grand jury returned an indictment, and the defendant pleaded not guilty. Shortly thereafter, the prosecutor took the case to trial, calling the witness to testify before the jury. The prosecutor did not disclose the witness's prior perjury conviction until the defense was preparing to rest. Defense counsel immediately moved for a mistrial, which the court denied. Instead, the court allowed the defense to recall the witness for the purpose of impeaching him with this conviction, but the witness could not be located. The court then allowed the defense to introduce documentary evidence of the witness's criminal record to the jury before resting its case. The jury convicted the defendant. The defendant has moved for a new trial, arguing that the prosecutor's failure to disclose the witness's prior conviction in a timely manner violated the defendant's right to due process of law. 一名检察官向联邦大陪审团提交了一名证人的证词，以确保被告因盗窃政府财产而被起诉。检察官没有向大陪审团透露，这名证人在四年前曾因伪证罪被定罪。大陪审团驳回了起诉，被告也没有辩护。不久之后，检察官将此案提交审理，传唤证人在陪审团面前作证。直到辩方准备休庭时，检察官才透露证人先前的伪证罪定罪情况。辩护律师立即提出无效审判，但法院否决了这一提议。相反，法院允许辩方召回证人，以便以此罪名起诉他，但无法找到证人。随后，法院允许辩方在休庭前向陪审团提交证人犯罪记录的文件证据。陪审团判决被告有罪。被告已提起新的审判，辩称检察官未能及时透露证人先前的定罪情况，侵犯了被告的正当法律程序权。【缺少答案，请补充】
If the court grants the defendant's motion, what will be the most likely reason? 如果法院批准被告的动议，最可能的原因是什么？
A woman's car was set on fire by vandals. When she submitted a claim of loss for the car to her insurance company, the insurance company refused to pay, asserting that the woman's policy had lapsed due to the nonpayment of her premium. The woman sued the insurance company for breach of contract. At trial, the woman testified that she had, in a timely manner, placed a stamped, properly addressed envelope containing the premium payment in the outgoing mailbin at her office. The woman's secretary then testified that every afternoon at closing time he takes all outgoing mail in the bin to the post office. The insurance company later called its mail clerk to testify that he opens all incoming mail and that he did not receive the woman's premium payment. The woman and the insurance company have both moved for a directed verdict. 一名女子的汽车被蓄意破坏者纵火。当她向保险公司提交汽车损失索赔时，保险公司拒绝支付，声称该女子的保险单因未支付保费而失效。该女子因违反contract.at 而起诉保险公司。在庭审中，该女子作证说，她及时将一个贴有邮票、地址正确的信封放在办公室的发件箱中，信封里装有保费支付。该女子的秘书随后作证说，每天下午关门时间，他都会将所有发件箱中的邮件送往邮局。保险公司后来传唤其邮务员作证，称他打开了所有收到的邮件，并且没有收到该女子的保费支付。该女子和保险公司都已采取直接判决。
1 2 3 4 5 6 11
更多题库
出海井控答题
2026客运中心-上岗证-站务员岗位题库
试题精简版 (”三不得“等)
√铁路营业线施工安全知识培训考试题库（2026版） - 与工务相关
1.变电运行专业-地市级
套筒窑安全复习题
电气化安全-通用（所有人）
铁路劳动安全-通用（所有人）
1.《车务-接发列车工种-安全知识-电化安全培训资料》试题
劳动安全题库-探伤工
采气工复习题
油品分析工高级判断
供电-变配电值班员（劳动安全）
1.2应知考试题库（Ⅱ级）
主系统(1)
主系统(1)
轧钢试题4答案
敏捷专项练习一（带解析）
防止冬季风险管控专项培训考试试题
低压电工证题库